Skip to Content
🚀Agentic Commerce Protocol is now live! Instant Checkout is available in ChatGPT. Learn more →
DocumentationHow ACP ComparesACP vs Traditional E-commerce

ACP vs Traditional E-commerce

Traditional e-commerce has been the backbone of online retail for over two decades. This comparison explores how the Agentic Commerce Protocol differs, where each approach excels, and how they might coexist.

The Traditional E-commerce Model

Traditional e-commerce follows a predictable pattern:

Visit Website

User types URL or clicks search result

Navigate categories, use search, apply filters

View Product

Read descriptions, check reviews, compare options

Add to Cart

Select variants (size, color), quantity

Create Account or Login

Email, password, verification

Enter Shipping Address

Street, city, state, zip, country

Enter Payment Details

Card number, expiration, CVV, billing address

Confirm Order

Review everything, click “Place Order”

Receive Confirmation

Email with order details

Average time: 5-15 minutes for new customers Conversion rate: 2-3% average

The ACP Model

Express Intent

“I need new running shoes, size 10, under $150”

AI Presents Options

Agent shows curated recommendations with explanations

Select and Confirm

“Order the Nike Pegasus”

Done

Payment token secures transaction automatically

Average time: 30 seconds to 2 minutes Expected conversion: Significantly higher due to reduced friction

Feature Comparison

User Interface

AspectTraditionalACP
Primary interfaceVisual (website/app)Conversational
NavigationMenu-drivenIntent-driven
Information displayAll at onceProgressive disclosure
User controlDirect manipulationVoice/text commands
Learning curveLearn each siteLearn one AI interface

Traditional Advantages:

  • Visual browsing experience
  • Familiar patterns users know
  • Good for discovery shopping
  • Full product image galleries

ACP Advantages:

  • Zero learning curve per merchant
  • Faster for known needs
  • Works hands-free (voice)
  • Accessible to more users

Product Discovery

TRADITIONAL FLOW: User: [types "wireless earbuds" in search] Site: [shows 500+ results] User: [filters: price $50-100, rating 4+, brand: Sony] Site: [shows 12 results] User: [reads descriptions, reviews, compares specs] User: [decides after 15-30 minutes research] ACP FLOW: User: "I need wireless earbuds for running, good battery, under $100" AI: "For running with good battery life under $100, I recommend: 1. Jabra Elite 4 Active - $89 • Designed for running (secure fit) • 7hr battery (28hr with case) • IP57 water resistant 2. Beats Fit Pro - $99 (on sale) • Wingtip design stays put • 6hr battery (27hr with case) • Apple/Android compatible The Jabra is specifically designed for runners. Would you like either of these?" User: "Tell me more about the Jabra"

Traditional Advantages:

  • See all options at once
  • Apply complex filters
  • Compare specs side-by-side
  • Serendipitous discovery

ACP Advantages:

  • Understands natural language
  • Considers context (running → need secure fit)
  • Pre-filtered recommendations
  • Conversational drill-down

Checkout Process

Traditional Checkout (typical steps):

  1. View cart
  2. Enter email
  3. Create account (or guest checkout)
  4. Enter shipping address (5-10 fields)
  5. Select shipping method
  6. Enter payment info (4-5 fields)
  7. Enter billing address
  8. Review order
  9. Click “Place Order”

Total form fields: 15-25 Average completion time: 3-8 minutes Cart abandonment rate: 70%+

ACP Checkout:

  1. AI summarizes order
  2. User says “yes” or provides payment token
  3. Done

Total form fields: 0 Average completion time: 10-30 seconds Expected abandonment: Significantly lower

Payment Security

AspectTraditionalACP
Card dataShared with merchant or tokenizedNever shared
Breach riskEach merchant is risk pointCentralized with payment provider
Fraud vectorsCard testing, stolen cardsToken misuse (limited)
PCI complianceRequired for all merchantsSimplified

Traditional Security Model:

User → Card Data → Merchant → Payment Gateway → Bank ↓ Stored in merchant database (risk)

ACP Security Model:

User → Payment Provider (Stripe) ↓ Generates Shared Payment Token ↓ Token → AI Agent → Merchant → Stripe Token properties: • Merchant-specific (can't use elsewhere) • Amount-limited (can't charge more) • Time-limited (expires ~30 min) • Single-use (can't charge twice)

Data Ownership

Traditional:

  • Merchant collects and owns customer data
  • User creates accounts everywhere
  • Data scattered across hundreds of sites
  • Privacy controlled by each merchant

ACP:

  • User’s data stays with user
  • AI agent knows preferences (user-controlled)
  • Merchant receives only necessary info per transaction
  • Clear data boundaries

Personalization

Traditional Personalization:

  • Based on that merchant’s data only
  • “Customers also bought…”
  • Email marketing
  • Requires account history

ACP Personalization:

  • Based on all user’s shopping history
  • Cross-merchant preferences
  • Contextual recommendations
  • Works from first interaction
Traditional: "Based on your browsing history on our site..." (limited to one merchant) ACP: "Based on your preferences for Japanese skincare and your sensitive skin notes from last month's purchase at a different store, I'd recommend..." (holistic view)

When to Use Each Approach

Traditional E-commerce Excels For:

✓ Discovery shopping: “I want to browse home decor ideas” ✓ Visual products: Fashion, art, home goods ✓ Complex configurations: Custom products, build-your-own ✓ Research purchases: Major appliances, cars ✓ Brand experience: Luxury goods, experiences

ACP Excels For:

✓ Repeat purchases: “Reorder my usual coffee” ✓ Quick needs: “I need batteries delivered today” ✓ Research done elsewhere: “Buy the Sony WH-1000XM5” ✓ Hands-busy: Cooking, driving, exercising ✓ Accessibility needs: Vision impaired, motor impaired ✓ Multi-merchant orders: “Get dinner supplies”

The Hybrid Future

Most merchants will support both approaches:

EXAMPLE USER JOURNEY: 1. DISCOVERY (Traditional) User browses home goods website Saves items to wishlist Not ready to buy yet 2. DECISION (Either) Returns later, or... AI reminds: "That lamp you liked is on sale" 3. PURCHASE (ACP) "Order that lamp I was looking at" AI: "The West Elm arc lamp, $249, now $199. Order it?" User: "Yes" 4. SUPPORT (Either) Track via website or... "Where's my lamp order?"

Cost Comparison

For Consumers

Cost TypeTraditionalACP
Time spentHigherLower
Mental effortHigher (decisions)Lower (AI helps)
Price findingManual researchAI optimizes
Mistake costMay buy wrong itemBetter recommendations

For Merchants

Cost TypeTraditionalACP
Website developmentHighCan add ACP layer
Cart abandonment70%+ lost salesReduced abandonment
Customer acquisitionHigh ad spendNew discovery channel
Support costsManual supportAI handles queries
Payment processing2.9% + $0.30 typicalSimilar

Migration Path

Merchants don’t have to choose—they can add ACP alongside traditional:

Start with Traditional Site

Your existing e-commerce platform

Add Product Feed

Expose product data for AI discovery

Implement Checkout API

Allow AI agents to create checkout sessions

Enable Payment Tokens

Accept Shared Payment Tokens

Now You Support Both

Traditional checkout AND AI agent checkout

🔄

ACP is additive, not replacement. Your traditional site continues working while you gain a new AI-powered channel.

Summary

FactorWinnerNotes
SpeedACPOrders of magnitude faster
Visual experienceTraditionalBetter for browsing
ConvenienceACPZero forms, zero friction
DiscoveryTraditional (for now)AI improving rapidly
SecurityACPToken-based architecture
AccessibilityACPNatural language interface
ControlTraditionalDirect manipulation
PersonalizationACPCross-merchant view

The future isn’t either/or—it’s using each approach for what it does best.

Specification maintained by OpenAI and Stripe

AboutPrivacyTermsRSS

Apache 2.0 · Open Source